Roru vs Traditional Wallets
Roru vs Traditional Cryptocurrency Wallets
Traditional cryptocurrency wallets provide basic functionality for managing digital assets, but they lack the privacy, security, and offline capabilities that Roru offers. This section provides a detailed comparison of Roru's approach versus traditional wallet solutions.
Fundamental Differences
Privacy Model
Traditional Wallets
Transparent Transactions: All transactions are visible on public blockchains
Address Correlation: Addresses can be linked through transaction analysis
Balance Exposure: Wallet balances are publicly visible
Metadata Leakage: IP addresses, timing, and network patterns expose information
Permanent Records: Transaction history is permanent and public
Roru Wallet
Shielded Transactions: Transactions are cryptographically hidden
Unlinkable Addresses: Addresses cannot be correlated through analysis
Hidden Balances: Balances are cryptographic commitments, not visible amounts
Metadata Protection: Timing, network, and other metadata are protected
Private History: Transaction history is private and encrypted
Security Architecture
Traditional Wallets
Software-Only: Keys stored in software, vulnerable to malware
Online Required: Most operations require network connectivity
Single Point of Failure: Compromised device exposes all keys
No Tamper Resistance: No physical security against device tampering
Recovery Risks: Seed phrases can be stolen or lost
Roru Wallet + Roru One
Hardware Security: Keys stored in tamper-resistant secure elements
Offline Capable: Full functionality without network connectivity
Isolated Execution: Cryptographic operations in isolated environments
Tamper Detection: Physical security with automatic key erasure
Deterministic Recovery: Recovery without exposing keys
Multi-Chain Support
Traditional Wallets
Separate Wallets: Different wallets for different blockchains
Manual Chain Switching: Users must manually switch between chains
Fragmented Experience: Different UIs and workflows for each chain
Cross-Chain Complexity: Complex processes for moving value between chains
No Unified Privacy: Privacy features vary by chain
Roru Wallet
Unified Interface: Single wallet for all supported chains
Automatic Chain Selection: Smart routing based on requirements
Consistent Experience: Same UI and workflow across chains
Seamless Cross-Chain: Private movement between chains
Unified Privacy Model: Consistent privacy across all chains
Feature Comparison
Transaction Privacy
Transaction Visibility
Public on blockchain
Shielded, cryptographically hidden
Amount Privacy
Visible amounts
Hidden via commitments
Sender/Receiver Privacy
Addresses visible
Cryptographically hidden
Transaction Linking
Linkable via analysis
Unlinkable by design
Metadata Protection
No protection
Full metadata protection
Security Features
Key Storage
Software (vulnerable)
Hardware secure element
Offline Transactions
Limited or none
Full offline capability
Tamper Resistance
None
Physical tamper detection
Secure Boot
Varies
Attested firmware
Isolated Execution
No
TEE/SGX enclaves
Biometric Auth
Optional
Hardware fingerprint
Multi-Chain Experience
Chain Support
Separate wallets
Unified interface
Cross-Chain Privacy
None
Full cross-chain privacy
Chain Abstraction
Manual
Automatic
Unified Balance View
No
Yes
Consistent UI
No
Yes
Offline Capability
Offline Transactions
Not possible
Full offline support
Offline Signing
Limited
Complete offline signing
Device-to-Device Transfer
Not supported
NFC/Bluetooth (Roru One), QR (Wallet)
Offline Proof Generation
Not possible
Local proof generation
Air-Gapped Operation
Not supported
Full air-gapped mode
Technical Architecture Comparison
Traditional Wallet Architecture
User Device
│
├── Software Wallet
│ ├── Key Management (Software)
│ ├── Transaction Signing
│ └── Blockchain RPC
│
└── Network Connection (Required)
└── Blockchain Nodes
└── Public Transaction BroadcastLimitations:
Keys stored in software (vulnerable)
Network required for all operations
No privacy protection
No offline capability
Single-chain focus
Roru Architecture
User Device (Roru Wallet)
│
├── Software Layer
│ ├── Shielded State Management
│ ├── Proof Generation
│ └── Multi-Chain Abstraction
│
├── Hardware Layer (Roru One)
│ ├── Secure Element (Keys)
│ ├── Offline Signing
│ └── Tamper Detection
│
└── Infrastructure Layer (Roru Infra)
├── Encrypted RPC
├── Relayer Clusters
└── Prover Networks
└── Shielded Transaction BroadcastAdvantages:
Hardware key storage
Offline operation capability
Full privacy protection
Multi-chain unified
Encrypted infrastructure
Use Case Comparisons
Private Payments
Traditional Wallets:
Transaction visible on blockchain
Amount and parties exposed
Permanent public record
Linkable to identity
Roru:
Transaction cryptographically hidden
Amount and parties hidden
Private, encrypted record
Unlinkable to identity
Offline Commerce
Traditional Wallets:
Requires internet connection
Cannot operate offline
No device-to-device transfer
Network dependency
Roru:
Full offline operation
Device-to-device transfers
NFC/Bluetooth support (Roru One)
QR support (Wallet)
Network-independent
Multi-Chain Operations
Traditional Wallets:
Separate wallets per chain
Manual chain management
No cross-chain privacy
Fragmented experience
Roru:
Single unified wallet
Automatic chain management
Cross-chain privacy
Consistent experience
Enterprise Use Cases
Traditional Wallets:
Limited compliance support
No audit layers
Privacy vs compliance tradeoff
Limited institutional features
Roru:
Compliance modes
Audit layers without privacy compromise
Privacy-preserving compliance
Full institutional features
Privacy Guarantees
Traditional Wallets: No Guarantees
Traditional wallets provide no privacy guarantees:
Best-Effort Obfuscation: Some wallets use mixing or obfuscation, but these are not guaranteed
Trust-Based: Privacy depends on trusting third parties
Breakable: Advanced analysis can break obfuscation
No Formal Guarantees: No mathematical privacy guarantees
Roru: Mathematical Guarantees
Roru provides mathematical privacy guarantees:
Zero-Knowledge Proofs: Cryptographically provable privacy
Deterministic Privacy: Protocol-level privacy guarantees
Trustless: No need to trust third parties
Unbreakable: Privacy based on cryptographic assumptions
Formal Guarantees: Mathematical proofs of privacy properties
Security Comparison
Attack Surface
Traditional Wallets:
Software vulnerabilities
Malware attacks
Phishing attacks
Physical device compromise
Network attacks
No tamper resistance
Roru:
Hardware-protected keys
Isolated execution environments
Tamper-resistant hardware
Encrypted network communication
Physical security features
Secure boot and attestation
Recovery Mechanisms
Traditional Wallets:
Seed phrase recovery
Seed phrase vulnerability
Single point of failure
No hardware recovery
Roru:
Deterministic recovery
Hardware-bound recovery
Multi-device sync
Encrypted backup options
Hardware recovery mechanisms
Cost and Performance
Transaction Costs
Traditional Wallets:
Standard blockchain fees
No privacy cost optimization
Cross-chain fees accumulate
No batching benefits
Roru:
Optimized proof generation
Batch verification
Cross-chain efficiency
Lower effective fees
Performance
Traditional Wallets:
Fast for simple transactions
Slower for complex operations
Network-dependent latency
No offline performance
Roru:
Instant shielded transactions
Offline transaction capability
Optimized proof generation
Efficient state synchronization
Migration Path
From Traditional Wallets to Roru
Install Roru Wallet: Download and install Roru Wallet
Create Shielded Account: Generate new shielded account
Deposit Assets: Move assets from traditional wallet to Roru
Assets Become Private: Assets automatically become shielded
Optional Roru One: Pair Roru One for hardware security
Full Privacy: Enjoy complete privacy and offline capability
Compatibility
Roru is compatible with traditional wallets:
Deposit from Any Wallet: Accept deposits from any wallet
Withdraw to Any Address: Withdraw to any blockchain address
Interoperability: Works with existing DeFi and services
No Lock-In: Can move assets back to traditional wallets
When to Use Each
Use Traditional Wallets When:
Privacy is not a concern
Simple, transparent transactions needed
Single-chain operations
No offline requirement
Minimal security needs
Use Roru When:
Privacy is essential
Multi-chain operations needed
Offline capability required
Hardware security desired
Enterprise compliance needed
Mathematical privacy guarantees required
Conclusion
Roru represents a fundamental advancement over traditional wallets by providing:
Mathematical Privacy: Cryptographically guaranteed privacy, not best-effort
Hardware Security: Keys protected by tamper-resistant hardware
Offline Capability: Full functionality without network connectivity
Multi-Chain Unification: Single interface for all blockchains
Enterprise Features: Compliance and audit without privacy compromise
While traditional wallets serve basic needs, Roru provides a complete privacy infrastructure that makes digital value behave like physical cash: untraceable, instant, borderless, and offline-capable.
Last updated